Search the site...

  • Front Page
  • Features
  • Columns
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Front Page
  • Features
  • Columns
  • About us
  • Contact

There is no middle ground in this war on terror

11/16/2015

4 Comments

 
Picture
FROM THE EDITOR
António Rolo Duarte
The number of terrorist attacks, genocide incidences and other tragedies that happen across the Middle East on a regular basis is too large to keep track of. On the other hand, that does not happen with the West. It does not happen with Europe. And it certainly does not happen with France – the land of liberty, equality and fraternity. Are we right to give more attention to this attacks than to others, or even disregard other events worldwide in order to provide full coverage of the Paris attacks? Of course we are.

At The Manchester Magazine we are not complaining about Facebook making a photo filter especially for this occasion and we are not writing about attacks in Lebanon, Afghanistan or a dozen other places I have seen mentioned in social media over the past couple of days. We are writing about Paris, we are solidary with Paris and we are in this together with Paris.

After the Charlie Hebdo attacks, many attempted to justify the tragedy with the newspaper’s satirical depiction of Islamic figures. It was disrespectful, they said, so by doing it the cartoonists were asking for retaliation. Well, now I would like those people to justify the attacks at the Bataclan, the Stade de France and across Parisian restaurants and streets. I would like to know what did these people do wrong. I would like to know what part of enjoying music, football or coffee offended Islam.

On Friday we saw a new kind of terrorism in Europe, one which involved little preparation, time or money but caused large amounts of damage. As Ricardo Costa, editor of Portuguese weekly Expresso explained in a brilliant article yesterday, the randomness of the event and the possibility of it easily being replicated elsewhere is the nightmare European security services had been dreading for a long time. More than 120 innocent, random people died in one of our capitals, with the number expected to grow as time goes by. Terror in its most disturbing expression, terror which seeks solely to cause death in the most cold-blooded and arbitrary way. Terror that comes from distant lands immerged into chaos we did not incite and do not sustain. Terror in the name of an ideology we do not understand and do not want to have anything to do with.

On Friday we saw clearer than ever that our enemies might come from abroad but many of them now live concealed within our own societies. They live in the shadows. Islamic extremists have to hide, lie and scare to succeed. But we do not. We fight in broad daylight. We gather in the streets, as 600 of us did in Manchester yesterday night. We sing our values loud and clear at concerts and conferences, we talk to each other in coffee shops and restaurants, and we write all over the newspapers and magazines.

Today there is not only a distinction between us and them, there is a clear distinction between what is right and what is wrong. In the West we have a long and bloody history which has led us to protest many times. When we are dissatisfied about something, we may call for a vote on it, organize a petition, rally in the streets, or a number of other options. But we do not go around blowing people up. We are different.

So as news outlets report fighter jets moving in on Syria since Sunday and talks develop within the international community, it is good to see that our politicians are not shying away from their duties. If we need to declare state of emergency in order to prevent more deaths, then we should. If we need to close borders and ground airplanes, then we must. And if we need to call our soldiers and ask them to defend us abroad, then it is our duty to do so.

Right now, I could not care less about what those from outside the West think about us or how they perceive our military actions. The people of the world must, once again, choose which side they are on – our side or the terrorist’s side. There is no middle ground. And believe me when I say this: we are right, they are wrong.

António Rolo Duarte is editor-in-chief of The Manchester Magazine. He is a Politics and International Relations student at The University of Manchester


Picture
4 Comments
John
11/16/2015 21:21:49

'Informative, impartial, independent'

Impartial - 'not prejudiced towards or against any particular side or party'

Awks.

Reply
PRD
11/16/2015 23:43:07

" Today there is not only a distinction between us and them, there is a clear distinction between what is right and what is wrong" - that's the point and you are right. Excelent column!

Reply
John Doe
11/17/2015 23:35:29

err things did not end up well when that last guy said, "you are with us or with the terrorists"

Reply
Cristina Braula Reis Coutinho
12/10/2015 19:51:11

Very clear position taken, and a brave one too. Well done! Thank you Manchester Mag and it's young talented journalists.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Columnists

    All
    Aaron Zitnik
    Antonio Rolo Duarte
    Bahar Arslan
    Corina Motofeanu
    Cosimo Mati
    Edoardo Tricerri
    Emanuele Filippo Ventura
    George Needham
    Jack Seymour
    Jeanmiguel Uva
    John Beswick
    Lioui Benhamou
    Margarita Poluektova
    Marina Jenkins
    Ollie Potter
    Reuben Cutts
    Riccardo Scroppo
    Richard Bolton
    Robert Lawson

The manchester magazine

Independent Student Magazine at The University of Manchester

Features
Columns

About Us
Contact

The Manchester Magazine has a profound respect for intellectual property. For this reason, all the images published on this website are either captured by our crew, provided to us by the owner or obtained in copyright-free image banks.



DESIGN BY ANTÓNIO ROLO DUARTE / THE MANCHESTER MAGAZINE
© 2015-2017 THE MANCHESTER MAGAZINE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

✕